Effect of Computer-Mediated Peer Written Feedback on ESL/EFL Writing: A Systematic Literature Review
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
AbuSeileek, A., & Abualsha'r, A. (2014). Using peer computer-mediated corrective feedback to support EFL learners’ writing. Language Learning & Technology, 18, 76-95. doi:10.1111/jcal.12004
Alvarez, I., Espasa, A., & Guasch, T. (2012). The value of feedback in improving collaborative writing assignments in an online learning environment. Studies in Higher Education, 37, 387-400. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.510182
Arnold, N., Ducate, L., & Kost, C. (2012). Collaboration or cooperation? Analyzing group dynamics and revision processes in wikis. CALICO Journal, 29, 431-448. doi:10.11139/cj.29.3.431-448
Bennett, S., Bishop, A., Dalgarno, B., Waycott, J., & Kennedy, G. (2012). Implementing Web 2.0 technologies in higher education: A collective case study. Computers & Education, 59, 524-534. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.022
Bower, J., & Kawaguchi, S. (2011). Negotiation of meaning and corrective feedback in Japanese/English eTandem. Language Learning & Technology, 15, 41-71. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/february2011/bowerkawaguchi.pdf
Braine, G. (1997). Beyond word processing: Networked computers in ESL writing classes. Computers and Composition, 14, 45–58. doi:10.1016/S8755-4615(97)90037-2
Caulk, N. (1994). Comparing teacher and student responses to written work. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 181–188. doi:10.2307/3587209
Chen, T. (2016). Technology-supported peer feedback in ESL/EFL writing classes: a research synthesis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29, 365-397. doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.960942
Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2010). Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instruction, 20, 328-338. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006
Diez-Bedmar, M. B., & Perez-Paredes, P. (2012). The types and effects of peer native speakers' feedback on CMC. Language Learning & Technology, 16, 62-90. Retrieved from: http://llt.msu.edu/issues/february2012/diezbedmarperezparedes.pdf
Ellis, R., & Shintani, N. (2015). Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. New York, NY: Routledge.
Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), 51-71. Retrieved from: http://llt.msu.edu/vol14num3/elolaoskoz.pdf
Guasch, T., Espasa, A., Alvarez, I. M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2013). Effects of feedback on collaborative writing in an online learning environment. Distance Education, 34, 324-338. doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.835772
Gutiérrez, X. (2008). What does metalinguistic activity in learners' interaction during a collaborative L2 writing task look like? The Modern Language Journal, 92, 519-537. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00785.x
Ho, M. (2012). The efficacy of electronic peer feedback: from Taiwanese EFL students' perspectives. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 5, 423-428. Retrieved from: http://universitypublications.net/ijas/0505/pdf/PRG405.pdf
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students' writing. Language Teaching, 39, 83-101. doi:10.1017/S0261444806003399
Kessler, G. (2009). Student-initiated attention to form in wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 13, 79-95. Retrieved from: http://llt.msu.edu/vol13num1/kessler.pdf
Kim, H. N. (2008). The phenomenon of blogs and theoretical model of blog use in educational contexts. Computers & Education, 51, 1342-1352. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.12.005
Kim, H. Y. (2014). Learning opportunities in synchronous computer-mediated communication and face-to-face interaction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27, 26-43. doi:10.1080/09588221.2012.692386
Lantolf, J. & Thorne, S. L. (2007). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. In. B. van Patten & J. Williams (eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 201-224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lee, C., Cheung, W. K. W., Wong, K. C. K., & Lee, F. S. L. (2013). Immediate web-based essay critiquing system feedback and teacher follow-up feedback on young second language learners' writings: an experimental study in a Hong Kong secondary school. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26, 39-60. doi:10.1080/09588221.2011.630672
Lin, H. (2015). A meta-synthesis of empirical research on the effectiveness of computer-mediated communication (CMC) in SLA. Language Learning & Technology, 19, 85-117. Retrieved from: http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2015/lin.pdf
Liu, J., & Sadler, R. W. (2003). The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, 193-227. doi:10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00025-0
Loewen, S. (2014). Introduction to instructed second language acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge.
Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction, and secondâ€language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379(1), 259-278. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb42014.x
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66. doi:10.1191=1362168804lr146oa
Matsumura, S., & Hann, G. (2004). Computer anxiety and students' preferred feedback methods in EFL writing. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 403-415. doi:10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.00237.x
Min, H. T. (2006). The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 118-141. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003
Mompean, A. R. (2010). The development of meaningful interactions on a blog used for the learning of English as a Foreign Language. ReCALL, 22, 376-395. doi:10.1017/S0958344010000200
Nguyen, P. T. T. (2012). Peer feedback on second language writing through blogs: The case of a Vietnamese EFL classroom. Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 2, 13-23. doi:10.4018/ijcallt.2012010102
Novakovich, J. (2016). Fostering critical thinking and reflection through blogâ€mediated peer feedback. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32, 16-30. doi:10.1111/jcal.12114
Ortega, L. (2005). Methodology, epistemology, and ethics in instructed SLA research: An introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 89, 317-327. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00307.x
Ortega, L. (2012). Epilogue: Exploring L2 writing-SLA interfaces. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 404-415. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.002
Ozfidan, B., Machtmes, K., & Demir, H. (2014). Socio-cultural Factors in Second Language Learning: A Case Study of Adventurous Adult Language Learners. European Journal of Education Research, 3 (4), 185-191. doi. 10.12973/eu-jer.3.4.185
Ozfidan, B. & Burlbaw, L. (2017). A Literature-Based Approach on International Perspectives of Bilingual Education. Journal of Educational Issues. 3 (2), 25- 40. doi.10.5296/jei.v3i2.11551
Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 265–289. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80117-9
Park, C., & Cho, S. (2014). The Effects of Korean Learners' Online Experiences on Their English Writing. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 13, 202-209.
Peterson, M. (2009). Learner interaction in synchronous CMC: A sociocultural perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22, 303-321. doi:10.1080/09588220903184690
Polio, C. (2012). The relevance of second language acquisition theory to the written error correction debate. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 375-389. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.004
Qi, D. S., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 277-303. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00046-7
Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory, and the “noticing†hypothesis. Language Learning, 45, 283-331. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00441.x
Rodgers, K. J., Horvath, A. K., Jung, H., Fry, A. S., Diefes-Dux, H., & Cardella, M. E. (2014). Students’ perceptions of and responses to teaching assistant and peer feedback. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 9, 36-56. doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1479
Sachs, R., & Polio, C. (2007). Learners' uses of two types of written feedback on a L2 writing revision task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 67-100. doi:10.1017/S0272263107070039
Sauro, S. (2009). Computer-mediated corrective feedback and the development of L2 grammar. Language Learning & Technology, 13, 96-120. Retrieved from: http://llt.msu.edu/vol13num1/sauro.pdf
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158. doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sheen, Y. (2010). Differential effects of oral and written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 203-234. doi:10.1017/S0272263109990507
Shintani, N. (2015). The effects of computer-mediated synchronous and asynchronous direct corrective feedback on writing: A case study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29, 517-538. doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.993400
Sotillo, S. (2005). Corrective feedback via instant messenger learning activities in NS-NNS and NNS-NNS dyads. CALICO Journal, 22, 467-496. doi:10.1558/cj.v22i3.467-496
Strobl, C. (2014). Affordances of Web 2.0 technologies for collaborative advanced writing in a foreign language. CALICO Journal, 31, 1-18. doi:10.11139/cj.31.1.1-18
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the Development of Children, 23(3), 34-41.
Wang, Y. C. (2015). Promoting collaborative writing through wikis: a new approach for advancing innovative and active learning in an ESP context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28, 499-512. doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.881386
Warschauer, M. (2013). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2/3), 7-26. doi:10.1558/cj.v13i2-3.7-26
Watanabe, Y. (2008). Peer-peer interaction between L2 learners of different proficiency levels: Their interactions and reflections. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64, 605-635. doi:10.3138/cmlr.64.4.605
Wichadee, S. (2013). Facilitating Students’ Learning with Hybrid Instruction: A Comparison among four learning styles. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 14, 260-270. Retrieved from: http://www.redalyc.org/html/2931/293125761005/
Wu, W. C. V., Petit, E., & Chen, C. H. (2015). EFL writing revision with blind expert and peer review using a CMC open forum. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28, 58-80. doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.937442
Xu, Y. (2007). Re-examining the effects and affects of electronic peer reviews in a first year composition. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 7(2), 1-21. Retrieved from: http://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/xu/article.pdf
Yang, Y. F. (2010). Students’ reflection on online self-correction and peer review to improve writing. Computers & Education, 55, 1202-1210.
Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179-200. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.017
Yang, Y. F., & Meng, W. T. (2013). The effects of online feedback training on students’ text revision. Language Learning & Technology, 17, 220-238. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Electronic International Journal of Education, Arts, and Science (EIJEAS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.