Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Project-Based Learning: Merging Rigor and Relevance to Increase Student Engagement
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
American College Testing, I. (2007). Defining rigorous content for ACT’s qualitycore[TM] end-of-course examinations. Issues in college readiness. Iowa City, IA: ACT, Inc.
Bicer, A., Navruz, B., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). STEM schools vs. non-STEM schools: Comparing students’ mathematics state based test performance. International Journal of Global Education, 3(3), 8-18.
Blackburn, B., & Williamson, R. (2009). Increasing rigor. Principal Leadership, 9(8), 28-31.
Capraro, M. M., & Nite, S. B. (2014). STEM integration in mathematics standards. Middle Grades Research Journal, 9(3), 1-10.
Chang, M., Mo, Y., & Singh, K. (2013). Opportunity to learn and student engagement: A HLM study on eighth grade science achievement. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 12(1), 3-19.
Clark, A. C., & Ernst, J. V. (2008). STEM-based computational modeling for technology education. Journal of Technology Studies, 34(1), 20-27.
Cook, N. D., & Weaver, G. G. (2015). Teachers’ implementation of project-based learning: Lessons from the research goes to school programs. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 19(6), 1-45.
Cooper, K. S. (2014). Eliciting engagement in the high school classroom: A mixed-methods examination of teaching practices. American Educational Research Journal, 51(2), 363-402.
Corso, M. J., Bundick, M. J., Quaglia, R. J., & Haywood, D. E. (2013). Where student, teacher, and content meet: Student engagement in the secondary school classroom. American Secondary Education, 41(3), 50-61.
DeBellis, V. A., & Goldin, G. A. (2006). Affect and meta-affect in mathematical problem solving: A representational perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 131-147.
DiStefano, C., Zhu, M., & Mîndrilă, D. (2009). Understanding and using factor scores: Considerations for the applied researcher. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(20), 1-11. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=14&n=20
Dotterer, A., & Lowe, K. (2011). Classroom context, school engagement, and academic achievement in early adolescence. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 40(12), 1649-1660.
Draeger, J., Del Prado Hill, P., Hunter, L. R., & Mahler, R. (2013). The anatomy of academic rigor: The story of one institutional journey.
Innovative Higher Education, 38(4), 267-279.
Fredricks, J. A., & McColskey, W. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In S. L. Christenson, A.L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 763-782). New York, NY: Springer.
Galvan, M. E., & Coronado, J. M. (2014). Problem-based and project-based learning: Promoting differentiated instruction. Nation Teacher Education Journal, 7(4), 39-42.
Goldin, G. A. (2002). Affect, meta-affect, and mathematical belief structures. In Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 59-72). The Netherlands: Springer.
Goldin, G. A., Epstein, Y. M., Schorr, R. Y., & Warner, L. B. (2011). Beliefs and engagement structures: Behind the affective dimension of mathematical learning. ZDM, 43(4), 547-560. doi:10.1007/s11858-011-0348-
Gourgey, H., Asiabanpour, B., & Fenimore, C. (2010). Case study of manor new tech high school: Promising practices in STEM education for comprehensive high schools. American Journal of Engineering Education, 1(1), 47-64.
Gresalfi, M., & Barab, S. (2011). Learning for a reason: Supporting forms of engagement by designing tasks and orchestrating environments. Theory Into Practice, 50(4), 300-310.
Han, S. Y., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). How science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) project based learning (PBL) affects high, middle, and low achievers differently: The impact of student factors on achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1089-1113. Published online. doi:10.1007/s10763-014- 9526-0
Hanney, R. R., & Savin-Baden, M. (2013). The problem of projects: Understanding the theoretical underpinning of project-led PBL. London Review of Education, 11(1), 7-19.
Harada, V. H., Kirio, C., & Yamamoto, S. (2008). Project-based learning: Rigor and relevance in high schools. Library Media Connection, 26(6), 14-16.
Hasni, A., Bousadra, F., Belletete, V., Benabdallah, A., Nicole, M., & Dumais, N. (2016). Trends in research on project-based science and technology teaching and learning at K-12 levels: A systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 52(2), 199-231.
Henson, R., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2004). Reporting practice and use of exploratory factor analysis in educational research journals. Research in the Schools, 11(2), 61-72.
Hospel, V., & Galand, B. (2016). Are both classroom autonomy support and structure equally important for students’ engagement? A multilevel analysis. Learning and Instruction, 41, 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.09.001
Jollands, M., & Molyneaux, T. (2012). Project-based learning as a contributing factor to graduates’ work readiness. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(2), 143-154.
Kennedy, T., & Odell, M. (2014). Engaging students in STEM education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246-258.
Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2006). Project-based learning. In K. R. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317-334). Cambridge, UK: University Press.
Marchetti, S. B., & Karpova, E. (2014). Getting ready for the real world: Student perspectives on bringing industry collaboration into the classroom. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 106(1), 27-31.
Moylan, W. A. (2008). Learning by project: Developing essential 21st century skills using student team projects. International Journal of Learning, 15(9), 287-292.
Navruz, B., Capraro, R. M., Bicer, A., & Capraro, M. M. (2015). A review of higher-order factor analysis interpretation strategies. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 6(1), 72-94.
Paige, D. D., Sizemore, J. M., & Neace, W. P. (2013). Working inside the box: Exploring the relationship between student engagement and cognitive rigor. NASSP Bulletin, 97(2), 105-123.
Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows (3rd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Sahin, A., & Top, N. (2015). STEM students on the stage (SOS): Promoting student voice and choice in STEM education through and interdisciplinary, standards-focused, project based learning approach. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 16(3), 24-33.
Schorr, R., Epstein, Y., Warner, L., Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Goldin, G. (2010, April). Measuring engagement structures in middle grades urban mathematics classrooms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO.
Siri, D. K., Zinner, J., & Lezin, N. (2011). Blending rigor and relevance. Leadership, 40(3), 8-11.
Stone, J. R., Alfreld, C., & Pearson, D. (2008). Rigor and relevance: Enhancing high school students’ math skills through career and technical education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(3), 767-795.
Tseng, K., Chang, C., Lou, S., & Chen, W. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 87-102.
Uekawa, K., Borman, K., & Lee, R. (2007). Student engagement in the U.S. urban high school mathematics and science classrooms: Findings on social organization, race, and ethnicity. The Urban Review, 39(1), 1-43.
Wan Husin, W. W., Mohamad Arsad, N., Othman, O., Halim, L., Rasul, M. S., Osman, K., & Iksan, Z. (2016). Fostering students’ 21st century skills through project oriented problem based learning (POPBL) in integrated STEM education program. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching, 17(1), 60-77.
Williams, C., & Wilson, S. (2012). Achieving both intellectual quality and relevance in classroom learning experiences: Some conceptual challenges. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(4), 471-484.
Winter, P. C., Kopriva, R. J., Chen, C. S., & Emick, J. E. (2006). Exploring individual and item factors that affect assessment validity for diverse learners: Results from a large-scale cognitive lab. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(4), 267-276.
Wohlwend, K., & Peppler, K. (2015). All rigor and no play is no way to improve learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 96(8), 22-26.
Yonezawa, S., Jones, M., & Joselowsky, F. (2009). Youth engagement in high schools: Developing a multidimensional, critical approach to improving engagement for all students. Journal of Educational Change, 10(2-3), 191-209.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Electronic International Journal of Education, Arts, and Science (EIJEAS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.