A Comparative Review of Audio-Lingual Methodology and Communicative Language Teaching in Second Language Instruction

Joseph Yoo

Abstract


A comparative review of two language instruction books will be examinted, Karl J. Grenbanier's Audio-Lingual Teachniques for Foreign Language Teaching (1961) and James Lee and Bill VanPatten's Making Communicative Teaching Happen (2003).  In Audio-Lingual Methodology (ALM), the insturctor transmits knowledge to a passive and minimally engaged audience with an authoritative role.  On the contrary, Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) diverges by proposing a new relationship between instructors and students providing them opportunities for communication, using the language to interpret and express real life messages.  ALM and CLT converge in the same practice of excluding explicit grammar instruction in the classroom.  Both methodologies accept as true; that grammar instruction is implicitly included in the classroom activities.  This article will attempt to answer if explicit grammar should be taught in the classrooms.

Keywords


Second Language Research; Applied Linguistics; Foreign Language Instruction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Atlas. [Def. 1]. (n.d.). In The American Heritage Dictiona of the English Language, Retrieved

March 14, 2015, from https://ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=Atlas

Grebanier, K. (1961). Audio-lingual techniques for foreign language teaching. Valley Stream, N.Y.: Teachers Practical Press.

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.

Retrieved from http://aces.ir/attachments/22d1286622494-communicative-approach-stephen-crashen.pdf

Krashen, S. (1989). We Acquire vocabulary and Spelling by reading: Additional Evidence for

Input Hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 73(4), 440-464. Retrieved from http://library.tamu.edu/

Lee, J., & VanPatten, B. (2003). Making communicative language teaching happen (2nd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Michigan State University (2013). Elementary Spanish I [Class Syllabus]. College of Arts and Letters Romance and Classical Studies. Retrieved from http://sites.cal.msu.edu/billvanpatten/syllabus/SPN101-Spring13.pdf

Ozfidan, B., Machtmes, K., & Demir, H. (2014). Socio-cultural Factors in Second Language Learning: A Case Study of Adventurous Adult Language Learners. European Journal of Education Research, 3 (4), 185-191

Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rodrigo, V., Krashen, S., & Gribbons, B. (2003). The effectiveness of two

comprehensible-input approaches to foreign language instruction at the intermediate

level. System, 32, 53-60. Retrieved from http://library.tamu.edu/

Sato, K., & Kleinsasser, R. (1999). Communicative Language Teaching (CLT): Practical Understandings. The Modern Language Journal, 83, 494-517. Retrieved from http://library.tamu.edu/

Savigon, S. (1991). Communicative Language Teaching: State of the Art. TESOL Quarterly, 25,

-277. Retrieved from http://library.tamu.edu/

Taylor, B. (1983). Teaching ESL: Incorporating a Communicative,

Student-Centered Component. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 68-88. Retrieved from

http://library.tamu.edu/

VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Pub. Retrieved from http://library.tamu.edu/


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Electronic International Journal of Education, Arts, and Science (EIJEAS)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

ISSN  2378-0991 (online)